Mitzvos before Matan Torah

We often find in Torah sources the notion that the nation’s forefathers — Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov — observed the entire Torah, even though they lived before the Torah was given to the Jewish people at Har Sinai. This has given rise to a vast rabbinic literature that interprets and clarifies various passages in the Torah in light of this principle, and addresses what appear to be counterexamples to it. In this article, we will clarify the concept of Torah observance in the pre-Matan Torah era.

Mitzvos    before    Matan    Torah

We begin by noting that there are indications in the Written Torah that at least some commandments were observed in pre-Torah generations. Consider the mitzvah of yibum or levirate marriage. The Torah relates that when Yehudah’s son Eir died Yehudah instructed Eir’s brother Onan to marry the widow. In describing this event the Torah uses the word yibum that later appears in the Torah as a commandment. Ramban writes that the sages of those times were aware of the enormous spiritual benefit of levirate marriage. He describes this practice as a custom (minhag). Others write that levirate marriage is one of the commandments that were incumbent on Noachides before the Torah was given.

The Talmud states that Avraham observed the Torah as alluded to in Hashem’s statement that Avraham observed “My safeguards My commandments My decrees and My Torahs.” With respect to Yaakov too   the Sages state  that he observed the entire Torah as  hinted to in the phrase “I dwelled with Laban” (Bereishis 32:5) with the Hebrew word for “dwelled” (גרתי) forming  an anagram of 613 (תרי”ג) that  evokes  the 613 commandments. Virtaully all commentators accept that Yitzchak also observed the commandments. On this basis they  question  certain acts of  Yitzchak  that seem  to have violated Torah law such as partaking of  meat  that was  slaughtered by his son Esau who  was an apostate and thus unfit to  perform kosher slaughter.

We further find that the principle of Torah observance is extended to the Matriarchs of the Jewish people. For example the Torah relates  that after the birth of Yitzchak Sarah rejoiced in  becoming able to once again nurse children. The Sages prompted by the Torah’s use of the plural form children as opposed to child explain that there were skeptics who scoffed at the claim that the aged Sarah had given birth to Yitzchak. To prove them wrong Sarah nursed other women’s babies who were present at the celebratory feast when Yitzchak was weaned. Several commentators note that this is an apparent violation of the halachah forbidding a Jewish woman to nurse gentile children.  This question presupposes that Sarah observed the commandments of the Torah.

We find as well that Yaakov’s sons are presumed to have observed Torah law. Thus the Torah states that in preparation for Yosef’s meal with his brothers he instructed that an animal be slaughtered and the Gemara explains that Yosef instructed that his brothers be shown that the slaughter was done in keeping with halachah. Between the generation of Yosef and the giving of the Torah we find that the classical authorities question the propriety of the marriage of Moshe’s father Amram to his aunt Yocheved  indicating a presumption that Amram observed the Torah.

Continue reading with Mishpacha.

Create a free account to keep reading.

Everything you need to stay close to Mishpacha.